Sure, I've attached the patch. Note that since you wrote specifically to attach the patch that makes the build with LibreSSL possible, I also include the changes in tests/Makefile.am which remove building of bad_dtls_test.c. On 08/31/16 08:51 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 20:37 +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: >> I'm not sure about other people use-cases, but I've used Openconnect >> with LibreSSL for about a year and couldn't really complain, although I >> use it only for remote work. I use GnuTLS-based Openconnect on other >> computer with different OS and don't really see the difference in >> performance. >> >> I really don't know other people's opinions but if you ask me, sure make >> it build. You could openly state in next release's release notes that it >> works, but may be slow (and you recommend GnuTLS), so that you don't get >> next mails from other people using LibreSSL and saying it's slow :) > > I can live with that. Can I have a single patch with a Signed-off-by > which I can apply to just make the LibreSSL version build? We can leave > it failing 'make check'. > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openconnect.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 4171 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openconnect-devel/attachments/20160831/9e2335b6/attachment.bin> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openconnect-devel/attachments/20160831/9e2335b6/attachment.sig>
