> On 15 Jul 2015, at 11:12, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav at gnutls.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Niels Peen <niels at peen.ch> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Niels Peen <niels at peen.ch> wrote: >>>>> - The worker processes will utilize the UDP socket address (if any), >>>>> when reporting peer's address if the listen-clear-file option is set. >>>> Is it possible to enable this feature for all connections? (Not just non-TLS connections.) The same functionality would be useful for TLS connections forwarded by a simple SNI selector like sniproxy. >>> I'm wondering whether it makes sense to do that which is an ugly hack, >>> instead of supporting the proxy protocol [0] from haproxy. It allows >>> the proxy to send all the useful information at session initiation. >> I can?t answer that. The reason I use sniproxy is because it allows >> wild-cards and a large number of different selectors with minimal >> overhead or configuration. > > Wouldn't it make sense to request that feature from sniproxy? The > overhead of version 2 proxy protocol header is insignificant. True. Done. https://github.com/dlundquist/sniproxy/issues/171 Best regards, Niels (re-sent as plain-text)
