On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 15:21 +0200, Martin Pauly wrote: > On 03.07.2015 10:24, Martin Pauly wrote: > > > But looking at your registry files, it definitely looks like > > > that's > > > what it's called. Does OpenVPN fare any better? If you run > > > 'openvpn --show-adapters' what name does it give? > > > > > But looking at your registry files, it definitely looks like > > > that's > > > what it's called. Does OpenVPN fare any better? If you run > > > 'openvpn --show-adapters' what name does it give? > > I played around a bit: > 1.deleted all TUN/TAP adapters with openvpn's batch file. > 2. installed openVPN 2.3.7 > 3. Then I get: > > C:\Program Files\OpenVPN\bin>openvpn --show-adapters > Available TAP-WIN32 adapters [name, GUID]: > 'LAN-Verbindung 3' {488B1FC7-0D49-427D-BCDA-F67447C78380} Was OpenConnect *not* working correctly at this point? Despite using the name 'LAN-Verbindung 3' as it should? > 4. Renamed Adapter to "TAP" > 5. Can connect fine with openconnect an vpnc-script.js, > with the interface coming from the openconnect install this time. > > > > What if you take the working one and rename it *back* to 'LAN > > > -Verbindung 3' (or 4)? Does it work then? > 6. did that, and now it works. OK... if it's working now and not in answer to my previous question... what's *different*? Can you take the same registry dumps and compare? -- dwmw2