On 3 July 2014 11:42, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote: > Hm, odd. Did you ever come up with a coherent solution to this? > Arguably, it's OK to do something which "breaks split DNS" in the case > when you weren't using split DNS, so we could make that line > conditional. But isn't DNS still going to be broken in the 'split' case, > and never give you answers for hosts on the VPN? My coherent solution is currently to use my other Linux or Windows machines, depending on what bit of the VPN I need to access, and will be installing the commercial VPN tools along with numerous other "approved" applications soon... I considered filing a bug but as I wasn't actually using vpnc, I can see it being ignored. Ross
