>>Actually, I think we want a kind of 'wizard' for openconnect >>configuration in luci. Rather than having hard-coded configuration >>items >>like 'username' and 'password' which aren't always going to be >>relevant, >>we actually want to work through the forms that the server offers us. > > That's not easily done on the current lucy interface. It allows easy > access to text configuration data but any interaction with applications is > pretty hard. So forget that I suggested a local Unix socket. Do your communication through the config strings :) -- dwmw2
