On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Barchan barchan <barchan75 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav at gnutls.org> wrote: >> Is it the UDP socket you worry about? In that case would it make sense >> to allow setting an arbitrary address to bind on, or should the client >> just bind the UDP socket to the same one TCP is using (see attached >> patch)? > A worry about both - TCP and UDP. For example if host has got 2 IP > 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.100 (on one or many interface) you should be able > to choose which one is source for all outgoing packets. > My idea is to see in openconnect similar option to wget's --bind-address=ADDRESS I see. You'll need to convince David on that, or even better send a nice patch :) regards, Nikos
