On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 11:23 -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > I tend to take a pragmatic approach to these kinds of hotbutton topics. > Everyone needs security, regardless of OS of choice (or requirement). > However, it's David's code, if it needs a different license, then it's > up to him. I'll ask once (if needed), respect the answer, and move on. It's mostly Intel's code rather than my own, in fact. So relicensing it would involve a fair amount of bureaucracy. Especially as I don't think I'd be keen just to switch to a MIT-style licence; I'd prefer to keep it LGPLv2 but with as minimal an exception as possible for allowing it to be present in the app store. Tracking down the non-Intel contributors and getting their permission too would be the easy part :) > Thanksfully, from the looks of VLC, that won't be needed. I'm not entirely sure what the VLC situation is. Is it back in the Apple app store now? http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2012/11/22/vlc-lgpl.html -- dwmw2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 6171 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openconnect-devel/attachments/20130228/ac75dd09/attachment-0001.bin>
