On 5/29/2011 3:33 AM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2011-05-28 at 22:27 -0500, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) > wrote: >> I tried to compile a package for Openwrt last time, and it didn't go >> very well. I spent a great deal of time, and made little progress. I >> believe that is why I'm running a patched version. > I don't think your current problem is related to the fact that you're > running v2.25. > >>>> After about 3 days, I lose all connectivity between the devices on my >>>> 192.168.1.x subnet. The devices can still get to the internet, still get >>>> to the remote vpn subnets, but cannot see each other. >>> How are the machines connected to one another? And if they can still >>> happily see everything but each other, wtf is your 'ping 10.85.0.1' >>> doing? >>> >> All the machines at my house are connected by wifi to the Openwrt box. >> Openwrt has the vpn connection to remote office. All home machines are >> on the 192.168.1.X subnet. 10.85.0.1 is a router IP at my corporate >> office I ping to check if the VPN connection is up or not. > OK, but you said that when the problem happens, they can still get to > the remote VPN subnets. So this 'ping 10.85.0.1' check would still be > *working*, and thus fail to detect the problem? > > Or did I misunderstand, and your 'reconnect script' isn't actually > solving the problem with the 192.168.1.x hosts on the wireless not being > able to talk to each other? Except that when it *happens* to trigger > because the VPN goes down, that somehow solves the (unrelated?) wlan > issue? > > It sounds like this is an OpenWRT routing problem. If hosts on your > *wireless* cannot see each other, that really shouldn't be anything to > do with openconnect. If restarting openconnect 'fixes' it then that > really makes me suspect the routing setup, because that's all that > openwer will really change. So I'll need to see those routing tables in > all three cases. > Like taking a car to the mechanic... Still hasn't happened since I posted this. Maybe it is because I'm using my local LAN much more now than before. Maybe a coincidence. I don't know.
