Since commit b03fc1173c0c ("bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops
on compile-time constants"), the compilers are able to expand inline
bitmap operations to compile-time initializers when possible.
However, during the round of replacement if-__set-else-__clear with
__assign_bit() as per Andy's advice, bloat-o-meter showed +1024 bytes
difference in object code size for one module (even one function),
where the pattern:
DECLARE_BITMAP(foo) = { }; // on the stack, zeroed
if (a)
__set_bit(const_bit_num, foo);
if (b)
__set_bit(another_const_bit_num, foo);
...
is heavily used, although there should be no difference: the bitmap is
zeroed, so the second half of __assign_bit() should be compiled-out as
a no-op.
I either missed the fact that __assign_bit() has bitmap pointer marked
as `volatile` (as we usually do for bitmaps) or was hoping that the
compilers would at least try to look past the `volatile` for
__always_inline functions. Anyhow, due to that attribute, the compilers
were always compiling the whole expression and no mentioned compile-time
optimizations were working.
Convert __assign_bit() to a macro since it's a very simple if-else and
all of the checks are performed inside __set_bit() and __clear_bit(),
thus that wrapper has to be as transparent as possible. After that
change, despite it showing only -20 bytes change for vmlinux (due to
that it's still relatively unpopular), no drastic code size changes
happen when replacing if-set-else-clear for onstack bitmaps with
__assign_bit(), meaning the compiler now expands them to the actual
operations will all the expected optimizations.
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/bitops.h | 10 ++--------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
index e0cd09eb91cd..f98f4fd1047f 100644
--- a/include/linux/bitops.h
+++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
@@ -284,14 +284,8 @@ static __always_inline void assign_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr,
clear_bit(nr, addr);
}
-static __always_inline void __assign_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr,
- bool value)
-{
- if (value)
- __set_bit(nr, addr);
- else
- __clear_bit(nr, addr);
-}
+#define __assign_bit(nr, addr, value) \
+ ((value) ? __set_bit(nr, addr) : __clear_bit(nr, addr))
/**
* __ptr_set_bit - Set bit in a pointer's value
--
2.41.0
