OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Also, it may be that things have changed by the time we get to calling >> fat_update_time after checking inode_needs_update_time. Ensure that we >> attempt the i_version bump if any of the S_* flags besides S_ATIME are >> set. > > I'm not sure what it meaning though, this is from > generic_update_time(). Are you going to change generic_update_time() > too? If so, it doesn't break lazytime feature? > > Thanks. BTW, fat is not implementing lazytime now, but it is for future. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
