On Wed, 10 May 2023 at 17:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 02:58:06PM +0000, Rudi Heitbaum wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 03:56:42PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 01:10:32PM +0000, Rudi Heitbaum wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 08:06:58AM +0000, Rudi Heitbaum wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:26:44AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.3.2 release. > > > > > > There are 694 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 11 May 2023 03:05:05 +0000. > > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > > > 6.3.2-rc2 tested. > > > > > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > > > > > Further testing and have seen ntfs3: NULL pointer dereference with ntfs_lookup errors > > > > with 6.3.2-rc2 (I have not seen this error before.) No other errors in the logs. > > > > > > Can you reproduce this without the extern, gpl-violation module loaded? > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > I dropped the bcm_sta and recompiled and commented out the i915.guc=3 > > and was able to reproduce. > > > > [ 84.745080] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000020 > > [ 84.746239] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode > > [ 84.747599] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page > > [ 84.748929] PGD 0 P4D 0 > > [ 84.750240] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI > > [ 84.751575] CPU: 2 PID: 3176 Comm: .NET ThreadPool Not tainted 6.3.2-rc2 #1 > > [ 84.752998] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC12WSKi7/NUC12WSBi7, BIOS WSADL357.0085.2022.0718.1739 07/18/2022 > > [ 84.754474] RIP: 0010:ntfs_lookup+0x76/0xe0 [ntfs3] > > And do you get this same crash on ntfs3 on 6.4-rc1? Is this a new > regression, or does it also show up on 6.3.1? Tested with 6.3.1 during the day today. No errors, and had been running 6.3.1 with no issue. Retested with 6.3.2-rc2 and problem immediately evident. So yes - I believe a regression. I have built and am now testing 6.4.0-rc1 this evening - no errors so far. [ 0.000000] Linux version 6.4.0-rc1 (docker@1ccd349e2545) (x86_64-libreelec-linux-gnu-gcc-13.1.0 (GCC) 13.1.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.40) #1 SMP Wed May 10 07:51:37 UTC 2023 > And ntfs, ick, why? And .NET? What a combination... Joys of media players. Test device gets to test exfat, ntfs3, .NET, and throw in a compile host/GHA runner to put it through paces. > thanks, > > greg k-h
