on 2022/4/21 17:05, Kari Argillander wrote:
> On 21.4.2022 4.57, xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> on 2022/4/21 1:43, Kari Argillander wrote:
>>> I do not understand why this RFC and not a patch.
>> I don't sure whether this small nit is a problem and can be accepted by
>> nfs3 group. So When generate a patch, I add RFC subject for it.
>
> RFC means request for comments. Usually this means that patch needs more
> work but I would like to discuss this topic before I continue this work.
> This was small nit and is no problem, but I just wanted to point that
> out.
Thanks, now I understand.
>
> Argillander
>
>>> On 20.4.2022 11.48, Yang Xu wrote:
>>>> Like ext4 and other use ${fs}_init_acl filesystem, they all used the
>>>> following
>>>> style
>>>>
>>>> error = posix_acl_create(dir, &inode->i_mode, &default_acl, &acl);
>>>> if (error)
>>>> return error;
>>>>
>>>> if (default_acl) {
>>>> error = __ext4_set_acl(handle, inode, ACL_TYPE_DEFAULT,
>>>> default_acl, XATTR_CREATE);
>>>> posix_acl_release(default_acl);
>>>> } else {
>>>> inode->i_default_acl = NULL;
>>>> }
>>>> if (acl) {
>>>> if (!error)
>>>> error = __ext4_set_acl(handle, inode, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS,
>>>> acl, XATTR_CREATE);
>>>> posix_acl_release(acl);
>>>> } else {
>>>> inode->i_acl = NULL;
>>>> }
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> So for the readability and unity of the code, adjust this order.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> fs/ntfs3/xattr.c | 6 +++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c b/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c
>>>> index afd0ddad826f..64cefa869a61 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/xattr.c
>>>> @@ -642,13 +642,13 @@ int ntfs_init_acl(struct user_namespace
>>>> *mnt_userns, struct inode *inode,
>>>> inode->i_default_acl = NULL;
>>>> }
>>>> - if (!acl)
>>>> - inode->i_acl = NULL;
>>>> - else {
>>>> + if (acl) {
>>>> if (!err)
>>>> err = ntfs_set_acl_ex(mnt_userns, inode, acl,
>>>> ACL_TYPE_ACCESS);
>>>> posix_acl_release(acl);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + inode->i_acl = NULL;
>>>> }
>>>> return err;
