On 12/02/2025 15.33, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:57:38PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Sat Feb 8, 2025 at 2:58 AM JST, Zhi Wang wrote: >>> There can be multiple cases of handling the GSP RPC messages, which >>> are the reply of GSP RPC commands according to the requirement of the >>> callers and the nature of the GSP RPC commands. >>> >>> Some GSP RPC command needs a new reply policy: "caller don't care about >>> the message content but want to make sure a reply is received". To >>> support this case, a new reply policy is introduced. >>> >>> Introduce new reply policy NVKM_GSP_RPC_REPLY_POLL, which waits for the >>> returned GSP message but discards it for the caller. >>> ... > I agree, please merge this one with patch 4 and add the corresponding 'Fixes' > tag. Thanks for the comment. I saw the previous patch is still on the -misc-next, so I was not sure if Fixes: is need here. Will add it in the re-spin.
