On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 20:45 +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > As I already mentioned for Timur's patch [2], I'd prefer to get a fix > upstream > (meaning [1] in this case). Of course, that's probably more up to Timur to > tell > if this will work out. Don't count on it. Even if I did change [0] to [], I'm not going to be able to add the "__counted_by(numEntries);" because that's just not something that our build system uses. And even then, I would need to change all [0] to []. You're not going to be able to use RM's header files as-is anyway in the long term. If we changed the layout of PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE, we're not going to create a PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE2 and keep both around. We're just going to change PACKED_REGISTRY_TABLE and pretend the previous version never existed. You will then have to manually copy the new struct to your header files and and maintain two versions yourself.
