Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] PCI: pciehp: Move check for is_thunderbolt into a quirk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]<

 



On 11/6/2023 06:41, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023, Mario Limonciello wrote:

commit 493fb50e958c ("PCI: pciehp: Assume NoCompl+ for Thunderbolt
ports") added a check into pciehp code to explicitly set NoCompl+
for all Intel Thunderbolt controllers, including those that don't
need it.

This overloaded the purpose of the `is_thunderbolt` member of
`struct pci_device` because that means that any controller that
identifies as thunderbolt would set NoCompl+ even if it doesn't
suffer this deficiency. As that commit helpfully specifies all the
controllers with the problem, move them into a PCI quirk.

Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c |  6 +-----
  drivers/pci/quirks.c             | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/pci.h              |  1 +
  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index fd713abdfb9f..23a92d681d1c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -991,11 +991,7 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
  	if (pdev->hotplug_user_indicators)
  		slot_cap &= ~(PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_AIP | PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PIP);
- /*
-	 * We assume no Thunderbolt controllers support Command Complete events,
-	 * but some controllers falsely claim they do.
-	 */
-	if (pdev->is_thunderbolt)
+	if (pdev->no_command_complete)
  		slot_cap |= PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS;
ctrl->slot_cap = slot_cap;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index eeec1d6f9023..4bbf6e33ca11 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -3807,6 +3807,26 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_CACTUS_RIDGE_4C
  DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_PORT_RIDGE,
  			quirk_thunderbolt_hotplug_msi);
+/*
+ * We assume no Thunderbolt controllers support Command Complete events,
+ * but some controllers falsely claim they do.

IMO, this wording makes little sense with the new code. How about taking
some text from the original commit's changelog:

/*
  * Certain Thunderbolt 1 controllers falsely claim to support Command
  * Completed events.
  */

The code change looks fine.


Ack, will change.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux