Re: [REGRESSION] GM20B probe fails after commit 2541626cfb79

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]<

 



On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 08:36:06AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 20:42, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 04:00:59PM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 at 21:37, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:28:49AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 22:27, Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 07:45:05AM +1000, David Airlie wrote:
> > > > > > > As a quick check can you try changing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:nvkm_firmware_mem_target
> > > > > > > from NVKM_MEM_TARGET_HOST to NVKM_MEM_TARGET_NCOH ?
> > > >
> > > > > In addition to Dave's change, can you try changing the
> > > > > nvkm_falcon_load_dmem() call in gm20b_pmu_init() to:
> > > > >
> > > > > nvkm_falcon_pio_wr(falcon, (u8 *)&args, 0, 0, DMEM, addr_args,
> > > > > sizeof(args), 0, false);
> > > >
> > > > Chiming in just to say that with this change I see the same as Nicolas
> > > > except that the init message size is 255 instead of 0:
> > > >
> > > > [    2.196934] nouveau 57000000.gpu: pmu: unexpected init message size 255 vs 42
> > > I've attached an entirely untested patch (to go on top of the other
> > > hacks/fixes so far), that will hopefully get us a little further.
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! I can confirm that it fixes the problem
> > on the Pixel C, and everything works as before the regression.
> > With this, for the combination of patches
> >
> > Tested-by: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > which I can resend after testing the final patch version.
> Thank you (both!) for testing!
> 
> I've attached a "final" version of a patch that I'll send (assuming it
> still works ;)) after re-testing.  There's only a minor change to
> avoid breaking the non-Tegra path, so I expect it should be fine.

Hello!

I have tested this new version and everything is working as before, so

Tested-by: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you,
Diogo



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux