Re: [PATCH] mm: Take a page reference when removing device exclusive entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]<

 



On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:14:34PM +1100, Alistair Popple wrote:
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -3623,8 +3623,19 @@ static vm_fault_t remove_device_exclusive_entry(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
>  	struct mmu_notifier_range range;
>  
> -	if (!folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vma->vm_mm, vmf->flags))
> +	/*
> +	 * We need a page reference to lock the page because we don't
> +	 * hold the PTL so a racing thread can remove the
> +	 * device-exclusive entry and unmap the page. If the page is
> +	 * free the entry must have been removed already.
> +	 */
> +	if (!get_page_unless_zero(vmf->page))
> +		return 0;

>From a folio point of view: what the hell are you doing here?  Tail
pages don't have individual refcounts; all the refcounts are actually
taken on the folio.  So this should be:

	if (!folio_try_get(folio))
		return 0;

(you can fix up the comment yourself)

> +	if (!folio_lock_or_retry(folio, vma->vm_mm, vmf->flags)) {
> +		put_page(vmf->page);

folio_put(folio);

>  		return VM_FAULT_RETRY;
> +	}
>  	mmu_notifier_range_init_owner(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_EXCLUSIVE, 0, vma,
>  				vma->vm_mm, vmf->address & PAGE_MASK,
>  				(vmf->address & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE, NULL);
> @@ -3637,6 +3648,7 @@ static vm_fault_t remove_device_exclusive_entry(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  
>  	pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
>  	folio_unlock(folio);
> +	put_page(vmf->page);

folio_put(folio)

There, I just saved you 3 calls to compound_head(), saving roughly 150
bytes of kernel text.

>  	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux