Re: [PATCH v6 16/23] drm/probe-helper: Provide a TV get_modes helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]<

 



Hi Noralf,

I'll leave aside your comments on the code, since we'll use your implementation.

On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 05:33:48PM +0100, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> Den 26.10.2022 17.33, skrev maxime@xxxxxxxxxx:
> > +
> > +	if (cmdline->tv_mode_specified)
> > +		default_mode = cmdline->tv_mode;
> 
> I realised that we don't verify tv_mode coming from the command line,
> not here and not in the reset helper. Should we do that? A driver should
> be programmed defensively to handle an illegal/unsupported value, but it
> doesn't feel right to allow an illegal enum value coming through the
> core/helpers.

I don't think we can end up with an invalid value here if it's been
specified.

We parse the command line through drm_mode_parse_tv_mode() (introduced
in patch 13 "drm/modes: Introduce the tv_mode property as a command-line
option") that will pick the tv mode part of the command line, and call
drm_get_tv_mode_from_name() using it.

drm_get_tv_mode_from_name() will return a EINVAL if it's not a value we
expect, and mode->tv_mode is only set on success. And AFAIK, there's no
other path that will set tv_mode.

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux