On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 22.09.22 um 16:25 schrieb Maxime Ripard: >> + drm_dbg_kms(dev, >> + "Generating a %ux%u%c, %u-line mode with a %lu kHz clock\n", >> + hactive, vactive, >> + interlace ? 'i' : 'p', >> + params->num_lines, >> + pixel_clock_hz / 1000); > > Divide by HZ_PER_KHZ here and in other places. > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/units.h#L23 >From the Department of Bikeshedding: I find "pixel_clock_hz / 1000" has much more clarity than "pixel_clock_hz / HZ_PER_KHZ". I don't consider the SI prefixes magic numbers. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
