On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:43:45AM -0800, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:12:50PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:39 AM Lucas De Marchi > > <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > > 411986 10490 6176 428652 68a6c drm.ko.old > > > 411986 10490 6176 428652 68a6c drm.ko > > > 98129 1636 264 100029 186bd dp/drm_dp_helper.ko.old > > > 98129 1636 264 100029 186bd dp/drm_dp_helper.ko > > > 1973432 109640 2352 2085424 1fd230 nouveau/nouveau.ko.old > > > 1973432 109640 2352 2085424 1fd230 nouveau/nouveau.ko > > > > This probably won't change for modules, but if you compile in the > > linker may try to optimize it. Would be nice to see the old-new for > > `make allyesconfig` or equivalent. > > just like it would already do, no? I can try and see what happens, but > my feeling is that we won't have any change. Maybe not or maybe a small win. Depends how compiler puts / linker sees that in two cases. (Yeah, likely it should be no differences if all instances are already caught by linker) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
