On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:21 PM Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 02:43:56PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 20:00 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 01:40:52PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2021-03-19 at 17:01 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 06:21:23PM -0400, Lyude wrote:
> > > > > > From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Currently we just assume that every cursor size up to data-
> > > > > > >cursor_max_w/h
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > be supported by the driver, and check for support of nonsquare cursors
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > checking if we're running on u815 and if so, which variant of intel
> > > > > > hardware
> > > > > > we're running on. This isn't really ideal as we're about to enable 32x32
> > > > > > cursor
> > > > > > size tests for nouveau, and Intel hardware doesn't support cursor sizes
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > small.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, fix this by removing has_nonsquare_cursors() and replacing it with a
> > > > > > more
> > > > > > generic require_cursor_size() function which checks whether or not the
> > > > > > driver
> > > > > > we're using supports a given cursor size by attempting a test-only
> > > > > > atomic
> > > > > > commit.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@xxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Cc: Jeremy Cline <jcline@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > tests/kms_cursor_crc.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > > > > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_cursor_crc.c b/tests/kms_cursor_crc.c
> > > > > > index 3541ea06..b9c05472 100644
> > > > > > --- a/tests/kms_cursor_crc.c
> > > > > > +++ b/tests/kms_cursor_crc.c
> > > > > > @@ -523,26 +523,43 @@ static void create_cursor_fb(data_t *data, int
> > > > > > cur_w,
> > > > > > int cur_h)
> > > > > > igt_put_cairo_ctx(cr);
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -static bool has_nonsquare_cursors(data_t *data)
> > > > > > +static void require_cursor_size(data_t *data, int w, int h)
> > > > > > {
> > > > > > - uint32_t devid;
> > > > > > + igt_fb_t primary_fb;
> > > > > > + drmModeModeInfo *mode;
> > > > > > + igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> > > > > > + igt_output_t *output = data->output;
> > > > > > + igt_plane_t *primary, *cursor;
> > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (!is_i915_device(data->drm_fd))
> > > > > > - return false;
> > > > > > + igt_output_set_pipe(output, data->pipe);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - devid = intel_get_drm_devid(data->drm_fd);
> > > > > > + mode = igt_output_get_mode(output);
> > > > > > + primary = igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
> > > > > > DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY);
> > > > > > + cursor = igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
> > > > > > DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - /*
> > > > > > - * Test non-square cursors a bit on the platforms
> > > > > > - * that support such things.
> > > > > > - */
> > > > > > - if (devid == PCI_CHIP_845_G || devid == PCI_CHIP_I865_G)
> > > > > > - return true;
> > > > > > + /* Create temporary primary fb for testing */
> > > > > > + igt_assert(igt_create_fb(data->drm_fd, mode->hdisplay, mode-
> > > > > > > vdisplay, DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> > > > > > + LOCAL_DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE,
> > > > > > &primary_fb));
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(devid) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(devid))
> > > > > > - return false;
> > > > > > + igt_plane_set_fb(primary, &primary_fb);
> > > > > > + igt_plane_set_fb(cursor, &data->fb);
> > > > > > + igt_plane_set_size(cursor, w, h);
> > > > > > + igt_fb_set_size(&data->fb, cursor, w, h);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + /* Test if the kernel supports the given cursor size or not */
> > > > > > + ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(display,
> > > > > > + DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_TEST_ONLY |
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET,
> > > > > > + NULL);
> > > > >
> > > > > Would be better to not depend on atomic. We have platforms
> > > > > that don't expose it yet.
> > > >
> > > > Do you have any other ideas how we could probe for this then? it seems like
> > > > the
> > > > only alternative would be to add intel-specific checks to fix that, or add
> > > > some
> > > > ioctl for querying the minimum cursor size (which sounds preferable imo).
> > > > would
> > > > the latter work for you, or do you have another idea?
> > >
> > > Just do it for real instead of TEST_ONLY.
> >
> > ah-and it'll still fail in that case I assume?
>
> Yeah, should fail just the same if the driver doesn't like it.
Doing the atomic TEST_ONLY first would be good, if atomic support
exists, since it's faster. Doing modesets just to figure out whether
we should test something is a bit expensive, best not to inflict on
that on new machines.
-Daniel
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
