Am 03.03.21 um 14:12 schrieb Ilia Mirkin: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 7:41 AM Alex Riesen <alexander.riesen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Ilia Mirkin, Sat, Feb 27, 2021 22:26:57 +0100: >>> Can you try Alex's patch to modetest and confirm that you see issues >>> with modetest? If so, can you (and maybe Alex as well) try an older >>> kernel (I'm on 5.6) and see if modetest behaves well there. [The patch >>> in question was to expose 256x256 as the 'preferred' size, but support >>> for the larger cursors has been around for a while.] Alex - if you >>> have time, same question to you. >> >> Sorry that it took so long. I retestet with the same kernel as Uwe did >> (5.4.101) and my results are the same: modetest with 64 and 128 cursors looks >> good, 256 broken. Didn't test with X this time (this being my main office >> machine), but can do later if required. > > Thanks for confirming! No need to test X - that will work fine, since > we were reporting the smaller cursors on that kernel. > > So I think we have definitive evidence that at least all Kepler > doesn't do 256x256 (and it's not just some bug in the display macro > rework that got introduced). And unless I'm blind and don't see the > corruption, Pascal seems fine. Question remains for Maxwell1/2 GPUs. > Unless someone has immediate plans to test on those, I'd recommend > bumping the minimum for 256x256 being reported to Pascal, and doing > 128x128 for Kepler / Maxwell. The only older model I have access to would be a 6600GT (NV43). Don't know if this would have any significance… Uwe > Simon, Lyude -- thoughts? > > Cheers, > > -ilia > _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list Nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
