Re: Accumulating CPU load from Xorg process with DRI3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]<

 



В сообщении от Sunday 16 August 2020 07:20:18 Ilia Mirkin написал(а):
> Well, if it's easy, try the patches I mailed to nouveau@ for the ddx.

I applied patches manually (copy-pasted patches failed to apply by git apply,
probably whitespace/end of line issues), and now I see in X log (after I left machine to run alone):

[  3584.553] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.553] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.570] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.586] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.602] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.619] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.635] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.651] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.668] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.684] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.700] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.717] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.733] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.749] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.766] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.782] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument
[  3584.798] (DB) NOUVEAU(0): PRESENT: Wait for VBlank failed: Invalid argument

and around 6mb more of those ....

but X still uses small amount of CPU:

 op - 15:04:41 up  1:32,  2 users,  load average: 1,25, 1,67, 1,60
Tasks: 220 total,   2 running, 218 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 22,8 us,  5,9 sy,  0,3 ni, 69,2 id,  1,4 wa,  0,0 hi,  0,4 si,  0,0 st
MiB Mem :  11875,3 total,   7630,1 free,   1967,5 used,   2277,7 buff/cache
MiB Swap:   1145,0 total,   1145,0 free,      0,0 used.   9172,1 avail Mem

  PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU  %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
 2777 guest     20   0 2155076   1,2g 126108 R  84,4  10,7  69:24.46 seamonkey
 1991 root      20   0  145764  78444  27936 S  14,6   0,6   6:42.10 Xorg
 3697 guest     20   0   61208  17268  13580 S  12,6   0,1   7:34.75 xmms
 2045 guest     20   0    6360   3932   2668 S   2,3   0,0   0:35.90 kompmgr
 2068 guest     20   0  102664  48952  30764 S   2,3   0,4   2:35.98 ktorrent
 2049 guest     20   0   42792  27908  23684 S   1,7   0,2   0:12.72 kicker
 2319 guest     20   0   40160  21248  18548 S   1,3   0,2   0:55.63 gkrellm
 2064 guest     20   0   50900  31592  23720 S   1,0   0,3   0:25.53 konsole
 5086 root      20   0       0      0      0 I   0,7   0,0   0:02.57 kworker/0:2-events
   10 root      20   0       0      0      0 I   0,3   0,0   0:09.96 rcu_preempt
 1918 root      20   0       0      0      0 I   0,3   0,0   0:04.78 kworker/3:0-events
 2240 guest     20   0   59660  37848  30248 S   0,3   0,3   0:02.36 konqueror
 2389 guest     20   0   33048  22592  20376 S   0,3   0,2   0:00.24 kdesu

with CPU frequency set to 1.4Ghz (minimum possible). Usually around 5.6%-6.0%
vblanks still work, at least glxgears from both cards still run at ~60 fps by default

I'll run with those patches for few more hours, but so far they seems to be helpful.

> 
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:06 AM Andrew Randrianasulu
> <randrianasulu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > В сообщении от Sunday 16 August 2020 05:49:19 вы написали:
> > > I've tracked down at least one source of these, which is that we don't
> > > handle drmWaitVBlank errors properly in the PRESENT logic (which would
> > > be used in conjunction with DRI3). These errors, broadly, will happen
> > > while strings are turned off and/or in DPMS sleep. Did your monitors
> > > go to sleep while a video was playing? If not, there's another path
> > > for it to happen...
> >
> > yes, X enters dpms OFF state automatically, and sometimes I even force it manually ....
> >
> >  xset q
> > Keyboard Control:
> >   auto repeat:  on    key click percent:  0    LED mask:  00000000
> >   auto repeat delay:  660    repeat rate:  25
> >   auto repeating keys:  00ffffffdffffbbf
> >                         fadfffefffedffff
> >                         9fffffffffffffff
> >                         fff7ffffffffffff
> >   bell percent:  50    bell pitch:  400    bell duration:  100
> > Pointer Control:
> >   acceleration:  20/10    threshold:  4
> > Screen Saver:
> >   prefer blanking:  yes    allow exposures:  no
> >   timeout:  0    cycle:  600
> > Colors:
> >   default colormap:  0x65    BlackPixel:  0    WhitePixel:  16777215
> > Font Path:
> >   /usr/X11R7/lib/X11/fonts/cp1251/misc,/usr/X11R7/lib/X11/fonts/misc,/usr/X11R7/lib/X11/fonts/cp1251/75dpi,/usr/X11R7/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi,/usr/share/fonts/ttf/western,/usr/share/fonts/ttf/decoratives,/usr/share/fonts/TTF,built-ins,/home/guest/.fonts
> > DPMS (Energy Star):
> >   Standby: 600    Suspend: 1200    Off: 1800
> >   DPMS is Enabled
> >   Monitor is On
> > Font cache:
> >   Server does not have the FontCache Extension
> > ----
> >
> > usually mplayer prevent blanking/dpms off while working, but Seamonkey (+ Youtube)
> > strangely not, so after I watch some videos and browse some sites I usually
> > leave my machine alone, so dpms kicks in .. after this I may continue to use
> > Seamonkey, or try to use mplayer
> >
> > I also think qemu + display=sdl,gl=on triggers something comparable, in terms of
> > CPU usage and sluggish X reaction over time even with DRI2 ....
> >
> > http://qemu.11.n7.nabble.com/qemu-system-i386-process-with-sdl-gl-on-progressively-consumes-more-and-more-host-cpu-td689409.html
> >
> > and I think I logged bug at Launchpad for this lately ...
> >
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg02020.html
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > >   -ilia
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 6:47 PM Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm aware of this issue, and am experiencing it myself.
> > > >
> > > > The issue is that drmmode_event_handler takes up more and more CPU
> > > > time. It seems like some events are being "left behind". I haven't had
> > > > time to debug it further yet though.
> > > >
> > > > I also have DRI3 enabled, but only very rarely do I make use of my
> > > > secondary GPUs, and I'm pretty sure I've seen the problem happen
> > > > without any PRIME usage.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > >   -ilia
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 6:45 PM Andrew Randrianasulu
> > > > <randrianasulu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I observed this bug for quite some time, but so far I workarounded it
> > > > > with just setting DRI2 (default) in xorg.conf.d/20-nouveau.conf
> > > > >
> > > > > Now with two GPU i iwsh to use DRI3, so right now it set up like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-nouveau.conf
> > > > > Section "Device"
> > > > >     Identifier "Card0"
> > > > >     Driver "nouveau"
> > > > >     Option "PageFlip" "1"
> > > > >     #Option "AccelMethod" "glamor"
> > > > >     Option       "DRI"           "3"
> > > > >
> > > > > But just after two hours of uptime X already eating some CPU:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > op - 01:30:49 up  2:45,  1 user,  load average: 1,12, 0,93, 0,84
> > > > > Tasks: 210 total,   1 running, 209 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
> > > > > %Cpu(s): 12,1 us,  3,9 sy,  0,0 ni, 81,7 id,  0,7 wa,  0,0 hi,  1,6 si,  0,0 st
> > > > > MiB Mem :  11875,3 total,   6416,4 free,   1634,8 used,   3824,1 buff/cache
> > > > > MiB Swap:   1145,0 total,   1145,0 free,      0,0 used.   9969,7 avail Mem
> > > > >
> > > > >   PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU  %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
> > > > >  1198 root      20   0  146160  78828  28160 S  35,8   0,6  30:41.37 Xorg
> > > > >  1285 guest     20   0   59776  17332  13756 S  11,6   0,1  16:12.83 xmms
> > > > >  4006 guest     20   0 1743952 919312 120628 S  10,9   7,6  20:51.01 seamonkey
> > > > >  1278 guest     20   0  101508  48528  30496 S   3,0   0,4   4:03.21 ktorrent
> > > > >  1274 guest     20   0   43368  31784  23684 S   2,0   0,3   0:29.43 konsole
> > > > >  1259 guest     20   0   43092  28232  23640 S   1,3   0,2   0:21.53 kicker
> > > > >  1255 guest     20   0    6560   4160   2720 S   1,0   0,0   1:00.90 kompmgr
> > > > >  1293 guest     20   0   40164  21328  18636 S   1,0   0,2   1:30.50 gkrellm
> > > > >  1254 guest     20   0   31616  21832  18944 S   0,7   0,2   0:06.49 kwin
> > > > >
> > > > > in ~1 day it will eat full core from my AMD FX-4300 and X will become sluggish ...
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried to trace it with operf 1.2.0:
> > > > >
> > > > > operf --pid 1198
> > > > >
> > > > > operf: Press Ctl-c or 'kill -SIGINT 7787' to stop profiling
> > > > > operf: Profiler started
> > > > > ^C
> > > > > Profiling done.
> > > > >
> > > > > root@slax:~# opreport
> > > > > Using /root/oprofile_data/samples/ for samples directory.
> > > > > CPU: AMD64 family15h, speed 3800 MHz (estimated)
> > > > > Counted CPU_CLK_UNHALTED events (CPU Clocks not Halted) with a unit mask of 0x00 (No unit mask) count 100000
> > > > > CPU_CLK_UNHALT...|
> > > > >   samples|      %|
> > > > > ------------------
> > > > >     78166 100.000 Xorg
> > > > >         CPU_CLK_UNHALT...|
> > > > >           samples|      %|
> > > > >         ------------------
> > > > >             62905 80.4762 nouveau_drv.so
> > > > >              5648  7.2256 kallsyms
> > > > >              4186  5.3553 Xorg
> > > > >              1419  1.8154 libpixman-1.so.0.38.0
> > > > >              1038  1.3279 nouveau
> > > > >               687  0.8789 libc-2.30.so
> > > > >               632  0.8085 libexa.so
> > > > >               510  0.6525 libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0
> > > > >               402  0.5143 libfb.so
> > > > >               259  0.3313 drm
> > > > >               230  0.2942 ttm
> > > > >               108  0.1382 libpthread-2.30.so
> > > > >                47  0.0601 libdrm.so.2.4.0
> > > > >                34  0.0435 [vdso] (tgid:1198 range:0xf7fbf000-0xf7fbffff)
> > > > >                27  0.0345 evdev_drv.so
> > > > >                 7  0.0090 snd_hda_codec
> > > > >                 5  0.0064 r8169
> > > > >                 5  0.0064 snd_pcm
> > > > >                 5  0.0064 libXfont2.so.2.0.0
> > > > >                 3  0.0038 snd_aloop
> > > > >                 3  0.0038 libglx.so
> > > > >                 2  0.0026 kvm
> > > > >                 2  0.0026 snd_timer
> > > > >                 1  0.0013 snd_hda_core
> > > > >                 1  0.0013 snd_hda_intel
> > > > >
> > > > > so, nouveau_drv itself is major CPU eater ....
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll try to rebuild it with debug symbols enabled, and hopefully it will be enough
> > > > > for at least seeing who eats all those cycles ....
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for so many emails, just i keep discovering new bugs as I try new things!
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Nouveau mailing list
> > > > > Nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
> > >
> >
> >
> 


_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux