Re: [RFT 00/13] iomap: Constify ioreadX() iomem argument

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]<

 



On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 09:13, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 9:07 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 5:53 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The ioread8/16/32() and others have inconsistent interface among the
> > > architectures: some taking address as const, some not.
> > >
> > > It seems there is nothing really stopping all of them to take
> > > pointer to const.
> >
> > Shouldn't all of them take const volatile __iomem pointers?
> > It seems the "volatile" is missing from all but the implementations in
> > include/asm-generic/io.h.
>
> As my "volatile" comment applies to iowrite*(), too, probably that should be
> done in a separate patch.
>
> Hence with patches 1-5 squashed, and for patches 11-13:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>

I'll add to this one also changes to ioreadX_rep() and add another
patch for volatile for reads and writes. I guess your review will be
appreciated once more because of ioreadX_rep()

Thanks,
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux