Re: Is Nouveau really using the io_reserve_lru?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]<

 



Am 26.09.19 um 23:44 schrieb Ben Skeggs:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 22:19, Christian König
> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> while working through more old TTM functionality I stumbled over the
>> io_reserve_lru.
>>
>> Basic idea is that when this flag is set the driver->io_mem_reserve()
>> callback can return -EAGAIN resulting in unmapping of other BOs.
>>
>> But Nouveau doesn't seem to return -EAGAIN in the call path of
>> io_mem_reserve anywhere.
> I believe this is a bug in Nouveau.  We *should* be returning -EAGAIN
> if we fail to find space in BAR1 to map the BO into.

Yeah, thought that this is rather odd. But I can't fix it since I don't 
really know the code.

On the other hand do you have any objections that I move the remaining 
io_reserve_lru functionality into Nouveau then?

It's only used by this driver and since Thomas cleaned up the VM 
handling that shouldn't be a problem any more.

Thanks,
Christian.

>
> Ben.
>> So is this unused or am I missing something?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nouveau mailing list
>> Nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux