Is vlCreateAdaptorXvMC just silly, or does it really want to take
ownership of the name pointer?
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 6:30 PM Rhys Kidd <rhyskidd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Fixes warning with gcc 8.2:
>
> nouveau_xv.c: In function ‘NVInitVideo’:
> nouveau_xv.c:2247:68: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘vlCreateAdaptorXvMC’ discards ‘const’ qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> adaptorsXvMC[0] = vlCreateAdaptorXvMC(pScreen, textureAdaptor[0]->name);
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~
> In file included from nouveau_xv.c:42:
> vl_hwmc.h:6:63: note: expected ‘char *’ but argument is of type ‘const char *’
> XF86MCAdaptorPtr vlCreateAdaptorXvMC(ScreenPtr pScreen, char *xv_adaptor_name);
> ~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Signed-off-by: Rhys Kidd <rhyskidd@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> src/nouveau_xv.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/nouveau_xv.c b/src/nouveau_xv.c
> index a7ec21a..3258ef7 100644
> --- a/src/nouveau_xv.c
> +++ b/src/nouveau_xv.c
> @@ -2244,7 +2244,7 @@ NVInitVideo(ScreenPtr pScreen)
> XF86MCAdaptorPtr *adaptorsXvMC = malloc(sizeof(XF86MCAdaptorPtr));
>
> if (adaptorsXvMC) {
> - adaptorsXvMC[0] = vlCreateAdaptorXvMC(pScreen, textureAdaptor[0]->name);
> + adaptorsXvMC[0] = vlCreateAdaptorXvMC(pScreen, (char *)textureAdaptor[0]->name);
>
> if (adaptorsXvMC[0]) {
> vlInitXvMC(pScreen, 1, adaptorsXvMC);
> --
> 2.19.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
