This happened to me today, too. Here´s what I found in warn.log: Dec 8 23:08:16 linux1 nntpcached[466]: nntpcache.c:281:Interrupted system call: SIGSEGV! Dec 8 23:25:22 linux1 nntpcached[8231]: nntpcache.c:281:Bad file descriptor: SIGSEGV! Dec 8 23:30:18 linux1 nntpcached[467]: nntpcache.c:281:Bad file descriptor: SIGSEGV! Dec 8 23:45:39 linux1 nntpcached[773]: nntpcache.c:281:Bad file descriptor: SIGSEGV! Dec 8 23:46:47 linux1 nntpcached[795]: nntpcache.c:281:Bad file descriptor: SIGSEGV! Dec 8 23:52:18 linux1 nntpcache-update[838]: sockets.c:373: saw more than one '\r' Dec 8 23:52:40 linux1 nntpcache-update[838]: sockets.c:373: saw more than one '\r' After deleting cache.mmap, nntpcached starts again. I saw another message several times: Dec 8 23:54:20 linux1 nntpcache-nocem[912]: nocem.c:325:No child processes: group change to 'news.lists.filters' failed What does that mean? Thanks! Bodo -----Original Message----- From: Anthony Perry [mailto:aperry@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 3:48 AM To: nntpcache-users@suburbia.net Subject: NNTPC: nntpcache has stopped! What I found with this is that the /usr/local/var/nntpcache/mmap files were becoming corrupted and causing the nnntpcached deamon to crash and burn. When I rm the mmap files (all of them), nntpcached seemed much happied. Occationally I had to remove the entire content of /usr/local/var/nntpcache/* and/or reboot the box. Very annoying. Anthony > > > Hiya good people. > > I've had a very weird thing happen with nntpcache. It stopped > running on our > slackware box last night, and is refusing to start up again. Everything > looks normal, no files have been altered, but the process is not > running and > there is NO debug information being passed to syslog other than: > > syslog: clean shutdown with error 1. dumping core for debug analysis > > I've modified to nntpcache.config file to include: > > logDebug yes > logInfo yes > logWarnings yes > logErrors yes > > But there is nothing logged that is offering any help. > > Anyone know about this? Any help would be really appreciated!!! > > Oh, its VERSION file contains 2.3.1 (dunno how recent it is, we just paid > the money, got it running and forgot about it). > > Many thanks > Anthony > > >