On Fri, 13 Feb 1998, Jeff Douglass wrote: > 7138 p1 S 2:33 nntpcache: waiting for connections > 7223 p1 S 0:53 nntpcache: nocem: => [server.] ARTICLE 225049 > > I turned nocem off and things were better. Anyone know about > this? nocem uses a lot of cpu in its child processes. PGP validation of signatures is processor intensive and I ended up having to upgrade my polatform in order to keep up. Load average here is currenlty 1-2 (96Mb p166mmx), however I expect that will settle when nocem finished ploughing through all the old messages and only has to deal with current ones (1500-2500 a day from rough calculations). Julian, how does nocem know what message it's up to in each group it's reading and where does it store the pointers? AB
