> > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > seems there's a lot of new stuff beeing currently added to nntpcache, > > so I'd like to ask if it will be also possible to implement the following: > > > > After you post an article via nntpcache, it would be desirable to > > make the current group "very old", in order to force the next GROUP > > command to fetch the updated min-max article numbers. Seems the news > > readers always do a GROUP command after they process the POST, > > but unfortunately nntpcache returns the cached (out of date) min-max > > article numbers. > > what are the results of the group command - will the reader report a fail > if there is no increment? I've tested this with tin - seems there's no error about this, but of course the new posted article doesn't show up in the list (with INN the users see the article immediately - and thus as via NNTPCACHE the article doesn't show up, they're trying to post it several times). Regards, Marian
