Re: single, comprehensive kernel data types document?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:37:07PM -0400, Rob Groner wrote:
> Sorry if this isn't related, it seemed like it was...
> 
> I recently discovered one of our drivers isn't written correctly for
> 64-bit.  It uses a uint32_t to hold an address. Whoops.
> 
> In previous drivers when I've needed to hold an address, I've used an
> "unsigned long", as (so far as I could tell) that would give me the
> correct number of bytes whether on 32 or 64-bit systems.
> 
> Now that I have to fix this driver, I'd rather do whatever the
> "standard" method is for storing an address value.
> 
> Looking at code in the kernel and linux/types.h, I see "phys_addr_t and
> dma_addr_t.  Is that what I want to use?  What if it's a virtual
> address?  void *?

You want to use '__u64' and cast properly within the kernel to a
pointer.

hope this helps,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies



[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux