a question about device trees for those (probably numerous) members
of this list that know more about them than i do.
recently, was given the following patch to be applied to a device
tree source file for a fairly elderly (MPC83xx-based) powerpc platform
that has 1G of RAM:
memory {
device_type = "memory";
linux,phandle = <300>;
- reg = <0x00000000 0x40000000>;
+ reg = <0x00000000 0x20000000>;
};
i was puzzled by the change that now seemed to define 512M of RAM
instead of the full 1G. the explanation i was given is that that is
how one defines where kernel low memory ends, thereby leaving the
remaining 512M for high memory in kernel space.
that's the first i ever heard of that. is it true? and if it is,
where in the kernel source code can i see that information being
processed and low memory being established based on reading that node
from the DTB?
in any event, i'd never heard this before -- if i was going to
define low memory on a powerpc, i would think the proper way is to use
this snippet from arch/powerpc/Kconfig:
menu "Advanced setup"
depends on PPC32
config ADVANCED_OPTIONS
bool "Prompt for advanced kernel configuration options"
help
This option will enable prompting for a variety of advanced kernel
configuration options. These options can cause the kernel to not
work if they are set incorrectly, but can be used to optimize certain
aspects of kernel memory management.
Unless you know what you are doing, say N here.
comment "Default settings for advanced configuration options are used"
depends on !ADVANCED_OPTIONS
config LOWMEM_SIZE_BOOL
bool "Set maximum low memory"
depends on ADVANCED_OPTIONS
help
This option allows you to set the maximum amount of memory which
will be used as "low memory", that is, memory which the kernel can
access directly, without having to set up a kernel virtual mapping.
This can be useful in optimizing the layout of kernel virtual
memory.
Say N here unless you know what you are doing.
config LOWMEM_SIZE
hex "Maximum low memory size (in bytes)" if LOWMEM_SIZE_BOOL
default "0x30000000"
thoughts? i thought i understood device trees reasonably well, but i
had never heard of this alleged configuration.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
