Henrique Montenegro <typoon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hello list,
>
> I am reading through the e1000 driver and trying to figure out how the
> probe function on it gets called.
>
> The driver initialization function calls pci_register_driver:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------->8
> static struct pci_driver e1000_driver = {
> .name = e1000_driver_name,
> .id_table = e1000_pci_tbl,
> .probe = e1000_probe,
> .remove = e1000_remove,
> // ...
> };
>
> static int __init e1000_init_module(void)
> {
> // ...
> ret = pci_register_driver(&e1000_driver);
> // ...
> }
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------->8
>
> And pci_register_driver is defined as (on linux/pci.h):
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------->8
> #define pci_register_driver(driver) \
> __pci_register_driver(driver, THIS_MODULE, KBUILD_MODNAME)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------->8
>
> Function __pci_register_driver is defined as (drivers/pci/pci-driver.c):
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------->8
> int __pci_register_driver(struct pci_driver *drv, struct module *owner,
> const char *mod_name)
> {
> /* initialize common driver fields */
> drv->driver.name = drv->name;
> drv->driver.bus = &pci_bus_type;
> drv->driver.owner = owner;
> drv->driver.mod_name = mod_name;
>
> spin_lock_init(&drv->dynids.lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drv->dynids.list);
>
> /* register with core */
> return driver_register(&drv->driver);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pci_register_driver);
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------->8
>
> This is the point where I am getting lost. I can't figure out how the Kernel
> will know about the functions defined in the e1000_driver struct mentioned
> before, since it does not seem to pass a reference to it anywhere.
>
> How does the kernel know where the probe function for this module is in this
> case? To be honest, for any driver that calls pci_register_driver, how will
> the
> kernel know where the probe function is since it does not seem like it is
> being passed to driver_register?
The magic is in the 'drv->driver.bus = &pci_bus_type;' assigment. This
is where the driver core will look for functions knowing how to handle
this specific driver. See Documentation/driver-model/bus.txt etc
Look at the defintion of pci_bus_type in drivers/pci/pci-driver.c :
struct bus_type pci_bus_type = {
.name = "pci",
.match = pci_bus_match,
.uevent = pci_uevent,
.probe = pci_device_probe,
.remove = pci_device_remove,
.shutdown = pci_device_shutdown,
.dev_groups = pci_dev_groups,
.bus_groups = pci_bus_groups,
.drv_groups = pci_drv_groups,
.pm = PCI_PM_OPS_PTR,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_bus_type);
And then look at the different callbacks. These explain how the generic
&drv->driver above is turned back into a pci_driver on probing:
static int pci_device_probe(struct device *dev)
{
int error;
struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
struct pci_driver *drv = to_pci_driver(dev->driver);
to_pci_dev() and to_pci_driver() are just macros simplifying the usual
container_of trick. From include/linux/pci.h :
#define to_pci_dev(n) container_of(n, struct pci_dev, dev)
..
#define to_pci_driver(drv) container_of(drv, struct pci_driver, driver)
Hope this helps.
Bjørn
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
