Re: CFS: Scheduler: How does each change in 'nice' value result in 10% change in CPU time?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:51:08 -0800, John Locke said:

>  * Nice levels are multiplicative, with a gentle 10% change for every
>  * nice level changed. I.e. when a CPU-bound task goes from nice 0 to
>  * nice 1, it will get ~10% less CPU time than another CPU-bound task

Note the ~ indicating approximately.

> If I take an example of 2 tasks both with weight=1024 (NICE_0) they
> should each get 50% of the CPU time. If 1 of the tasks is reniced to
> NICE_1 then the NICE_0 task will get 1024/(1024+820)=56% of the CPU
> time and  the NICE_1 task will get 44% of the CPU time.

12% difference - that's around 10%.

Attachment: pgp0Tz1ffoSxk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux