On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:38 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 18:45:51 -0600, Victor Rodriguez said: >> Despite the fact that this is not a well formulated question. > > Exactly why it's hard to give a good answer. It *really* depends on > what aspect you're interested in - I/O bandwidth, throughput, latency, > or other. What I currently do at $DAYJOB is worry how fast I can get > a cluster of servers to flip blocks to and from disk to 40Gbit network > interfaces, and we've found a combo of iozone's and 'tar xf linux-2.6.32.tar.gz' > running at the same time is a good stand-in for our production workload. > > Of course, your mileage will vary. :) Iozone is fine and I think you give me a good reason to turn my eyes into it again . I decided not to check it due to the fact that is a micro bench and sometimes users want numbers of something they can feel ( how fast can I de compres , how many transactions per second can my DB manage , how fast can I build my product ) I was answering in Greg mail , that it might be good to came with a BKM of tests for the kernel , a list of linked test ( if you move this you will affect that , please test before commit ) , it might be just an initial idea but sure for industry might be something helpful Feedback more than welcome Regards Victor Rodriguez _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
