On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:31:20PM -0400, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: > From: "Gabriel Somlo" <somlo@xxxxxxx> > > Each fw_cfg entry of type "file" has an associated 56-char, > nul-terminated ASCII string which represents its name. While > the fw_cfg device doesn't itself impose any specific naming > convention, QEMU developers have traditionally used path name > semantics (i.e. "etc/acpi/rsdp") to descriptively name the > various fw_cfg "blobs" passed into the guest. > > This patch attempts, on a best effort basis, to create a > directory hierarchy representing the content of fw_cfg file > names, under /sys/firmware/fw_cfg/by_name. > > Upon successful creation of all directories representing the > "dirname" portion of a fw_cfg file, a symlink will be created > to represent the "basename", pointing at the appropriate > /sys/firmware/fw_cfg/by_select entry. If a file name is not > suitable for this procedure (e.g., if its basename or dirname > components collide with an already existing dirname component > or basename, respectively) the corresponding fw_cfg blob is > skipped and will remain available in sysfs only by its selector > key value. Shouldn't all of this be done in userspace with the symlinks and all? It seems like you are trying to duplicate the /dev/block/by-name and such. Policy decisions like symlinks and naming should be done there, in userspace, and not directly in sysfs if at all possible. Again, why can't this be a bunch of character device nodes? It seems like you want to access them that way (read/write, ioctl, etc.) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
