Dear alias, I noticed there is a time_slice variable for SCHED_RR policy in task_struct.rt member (I am using 4.1.0 kernel): struct sched_rt_entity { ... unsigned int time_slice; ... }; Per my understanding, the task_struct.rt.time_slice should be initialized to sched_rr_timeslice or RR_TIMESLICE . Like what process 0 has done: #define INIT_TASK(tsk) \ { ... .rt = { \ .run_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(tsk.rt.run_list), \ .time_slice = RR_TIMESLICE, \ }, ... } However I didn't see somewhere in copy_process() to set time_slice value for a new forked SCHED_RR process. If time_slice is not initialized, time_slice will be with value 0 and will be overflow to a big value in following "if (--p->rt.time_slice)" statement: static void task_tick_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int queued) { ... /* * RR tasks need a special form of timeslice management. * FIFO tasks have no timeslices. */ if (p->policy != SCHED_RR) return; if (--p->rt.time_slice) return; p->rt.time_slice = sched_rr_timeslice; ... } Is it a bug? Please correct me if I am wrong. Thanks, Simon _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies