that .config you sent is for 4.0-rc2, is that right? here is the diff after a make oldconfig [1] [1] http://pastebin.com/4Lfs2it0 On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Andev <debiandev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:03 AM, leo kirotawa <kirotawa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I could boot it using qemu. So what's the point? > > Could you try the attached config and see if it boots? > >> >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Andev <debiandev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@xxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > Andev wrote: >>> >> I usually compile my kernel with an unsupported O3 option(why not? :). >>> > >>> > Because there have been publications that show on major benchmarks, >>> > the effects of -O3 are indistinguishable from noise: >>> > http://people.cs.umass.edu/~emery/pubs/Stabilizer-UMass-CS-TR2011-43.pdf >>> > >>> > Have you noticed that -O3 provides any performance benefits over -O2? >>> > >>> >>> Look here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1962561.html >>> >>> Btw, this will help uncover problems in either gcc or the kernel for >>> sure. So no harm in trying! >>> >>> -- >>> Andev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Kernelnewbies mailing list >>> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ---------------------------------------------- >> Leônidas S. Barbosa (Kirotawa) >> blog: corecode.wordpress.com > > > > -- > Andev -- ---------------------------------------------- Leônidas S. Barbosa (Kirotawa) blog: corecode.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
