I have listened to peoples feedback. Am I still missing something as I now do 1. Build test all patches 2. Reading the code properly 3.Testing my patches 4.Listening to feedback Nick On March 15, 2015 12:39:31 PM EDT, Hugo Mills <hugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 12:24:12PM -0400, Ruben Safir wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 05:16:27PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 12:01:27PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote: >> > > >> [...] >> > > I was interested in Socs in staging as I believe there are a few >> > > would someone like to point me to one that I can get hardware >for. >> > >> > Please read my message again. It should be YOU who does the >research >> > about the work that YOU want to do, not us... >> >> >> I didn't write this. Are you intentionally trolling this? > > Nobody's claiming you did. This is a different thread to yours, >with a different subject line. Note that none of the quoted messages >above had your name as attribution. > >> The initial message under this subject had nothing to do with this. >> BTW - the atitiude is piss poor for what is SUPPOSED to be newbies >area. >> Try taking some trips from Ernie and Fewer from Bert. > > This particular newbie (nick) has a reasonably long and ignoble >history in the kernel development area. He used up quite a lot of the >available polite late last summer, and isn't at the moment giving any >indications that he's made any improvements. > >> PS - no need to CC me when I'm reading the list. > > It's the default position on these mailing lists. You're generally >not going to have anyone remember that you don't want to be CC'd. A >message in your .sig to that effect might help, but it probably won't. > > Hugo. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
