Re: CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, palik imre wrote:

> On Friday, 13 March 2015, 13:43, Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Mar 2015, palik imre wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > Sorry for the silly question, but I have some issues with this checkpatch.pl warning.
> > >
> > > I mean Documentation/CodingStyle says:
> > >
> > > Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never
> > > used for indentation, and the above example is deliberately broken.
> > >
> > > But checkpatch.pl claims I should align to open parentheses.  These two things seem to be contradictory to me.  Could somebody clarify this?
> > 
> > >
> > leading tabs *followed* by spaces to align parameters to a function are fine
> 
> The emacs settings in Documentation/CodingStyle seem to contradict to you,
> as it is set up to use c-lineup-arglist-tabs-only
>
The problem is that CodingStyle does not explicitly address
parameter alignment for functions that do not fit on a single line
but checkpatch.pl does

you can try it out - if you align to the opening braces with spaces
with preceding TABs it will not fuss and this is also common practice.

thx!
hofrat

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux