wrapper device driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I'm writing a device driver to to provide a wrapper device around a
real device. Is it acceptable to do the following:

wrapper_dev_open(flags) {
   // do additional bookkeeping
   real_dev_filp = filp_open(real_device_node_path, flags);
}

wrapper_dev_mmap(mmap_parameters) {
   // do additional checks
   return real_dev_filp->f_op->mmap(mmap_parameters);
}

wrapper_dev_ioctl(ioctl_parameters) {
   // do additional checks
   return real_dev_filp->f_op->ioctl(ioctl_parameters);
}

Is it safe to do something like this? what would be the caveats? Given
a good use case, would the maintainers be willing to mainstream
something like this? Thanks!

-Riya

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux