On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:02:01 -0500, David Legault said: > the idea was to load a module passing the path as a module argument so I > could access the underlying block device through the link without having to > worry about the real block device path. I hope you realize that scribbling on a block device without making *damned* sure you're talking to the right *real* block device is just asking for data corruption, right? What problem are you *really* trying to solve here? It sounds like your design has some serious layering violations....
Attachment:
pgpj7U1qWzgxH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
