This is a simple patch that initializes a function with NULL to avoid some compiler warnings. In such cases should I proceed as a normal patch or it is better to send to another ML like to one for trivial patches? Thanks, Tinti
>From a391789bf44afbdbe2a7b3c76301b5ece9f72475 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Vin=C3=ADcius=20Tinti?= <viniciustinti@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:35:34 -0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86: LLVMLinux: Fix uninitialized function do_reloc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Explicit initializes do_reloc function with NULL. Later the function is either proper initialized of an error issued. Signed-off-by: Vinícius Tinti <viniciustinti@xxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/tools/relocs.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c index 0c2fae8..1d533f1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c +++ b/arch/x86/tools/relocs.c @@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ static void emit_relocs(int as_text, int use_real_mode) int i; int (*write_reloc)(uint32_t, FILE *) = write32; int (*do_reloc)(struct section *sec, Elf_Rel *rel, Elf_Sym *sym, - const char *symname); + const char *symname) = NULL; #if ELF_BITS == 64 if (!use_real_mode) -- 2.2.1
_______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
