-----Original Message----- From: Anand Moon [mailto:moon.linux@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 12:30 PM To: Giridhara RP (grp); Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx Cc: Greg KH; kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung Hi Giridhara, http://ark.intel.com/products/64622/Intel-Xeon-Processor-E5-4650-20M-Cache-2_70-GHz-8_00-GTs-Intel-QPI Show it has only 8 core of CPU. Why are you setting the CONFIG_NR_CPUS=64. certainly it will have a issue in the kernel. -Anand Moon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Anand, Agree it’s a 8 core processor, but Hyper threading is supported in this CPU. Thanks Giri On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:27 AM, Giridhara RP (grp) <grp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:15 AM To: Giridhara RP (grp) Cc: Greg KH; kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.32.60 64bit Crash/Hung On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:06:00 +0000, "Giridhara RP (grp)" said: > Which kernel version should I use to solve this crash/panic? That will depend on exactly why you're still running a 2.6.32 kernel from 6 years ago. Remember - the fact it's all the way up to 2.6.32.65 doesn't mean you have all the bugfixes. It only means you have all the bugfixes that qualified for the -stable side of the fence (which is a small fraction of all the fixes that have happened in the past 6 years). ----------------------- Hi Valdis, We were running 2.6.32.60 assuming it's a stable build and my assumption was wrong :(. Should I go ahead with stable 3.18.3 [2015-01-16 ]. Thanks Giri _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
