Re: Split RAID: Proposal for archival RAID using incremental batch checksum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:58:08 +0530, Anshuman Aggarwal said:

> prevents it from directly recognized by file system code . I was
> wondering if Split RAID block devices can be made to be unaware to the
> RAID scheme on top and be fully mountable and usable without the raid
> drivers (of course invalidating the parity if any of them are written

Well, there's two basic cases:

1) You have one device and you're adding a parity device - which is
basically just creating a raid-1 mirror when you get down to it.

2) You have some collection of devices in a stripe/concat/whatever, and are
adding a parity device.  This only works if the existing stripe/concat
is already functional *without* the parity device (which implies that said
stripe or concat has to be an already-supported structure)

Attachment: pgpgShWbAkYeK.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux