Re: On virt_to_phys doubts.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks. It set a byte in RAM and checked it using md.b in u-boot.

-Gautam.

On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Miles MH Chen <orca.chen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ok, now we can say the virt_to_phys returns a correct physical address.
> 0x32d01fe0. It is a physical address, not a simple offset in dram. Your 64Mb
> dram has physical address within 0x30000000 ~ 0x34000000.
>
> MH
>
> 2014/9/13 下午9:52 於 "mind entropy" <mindentropy@xxxxxxxxx> 寫道:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Miles MH Chen <orca.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > Kernel physical addr : 0x32d01fe0
>> > Platform phys offset : 0x30000000
>> > Page offset : 0xc0553fb4
>> >
>> > The page offset looks weird, since 32bit kernel has 2/2 or 3/1 or 1/3
>> > user/kernel virtual address  split. It is not reasonable to have
>> > 0xc0553fb4
>> > as page offset. You should c0000000 for 3/1 split.
>> >
>>
>> My fault. I had done "0x%llx" in printk. Now I just did a %x and it
>> shows as 0xc0000000.
>>
>> -Gautam.

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies





[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux