Re: A quick guide to why stand-alone checkpatch patches suck...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 5:08 PM, nick <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 14-09-17 07:20 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
<snip>
>>   anyway, it's time for coffee.
>>
>> rday
>>
> Rday and others,
> That's not what I wanted I was trying to improve my rep after getting banned from vger.org and now it seems
> I can't even get a patch right. In addition I was trying to do check patch because  it was easier for me
> due to not understanding some parts of the code.
> Nick
>

try to understand the code first. if you do not understand the code
how do you know that your patch will not break any part of the logic .
ok , by adding blank lines you will not break the logic.
but yesterday in your other patch you removed an error message . may i
ask why did you think that error message is not required ?

thanks
sudip

> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux