On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> Fixing trivial checkpatch warnings about missing blank lines after declarations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx>
... snip ...
>From Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
"The "summary phrase" may be prefixed by tags enclosed in square
brackets: "Subject: [PATCH tag] <summary phrase>". The tags are not
considered part of the summary phrase, but describe how the patch
should be treated. Common tags might include a version descriptor if
the multiple versions of the patch have been sent out in response to
comments (i.e., "v1, v2, v3") ..."
this is now ... what? version 6? 7? 8? of a patch that adds three
blank lines to a file. so ... still wrong.
didn't you say you were going to leave if you couldn't submit the
next patch properly? whatever happened to that promise?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
