Re: A quick guide to why stand-alone checkpatch patches suck...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:42:18PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
>> (And this sort of analysis is exactly *why* people need to apply their brains
>> when looking at checkpatch output....)
>
> No one has ever said that they shouldn't.
>
> Remember, I know _lots_ of kernel developers who started with just
> "checkpatch cleanups on staging drivers" and they moved on to much
> "higher" roles in the kernel developer ecosystem (jobs, maintainers of
> subsystems, keynote talks at conferences, etc.)
>

thats encouraging information .  :)
thanks Greg

> Don't "po po" it as something that shouldn't be a valid place to start,
> it is, and is why I do the work to review all of the many thousands of
> staging patches every release cycle.
>
> No one is forcing you to write those patches, or read / review them, so
> don't discourage others to provide them either please.  I most certainly
> do not.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kernelnewbies mailing list
> Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies




[Index of Archives]     [Newbies FAQ]     [Linux Kernel Mentors]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [IETF Annouce]     [Git]     [Networking]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux ACPI]
  Powered by Linux