On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Nick,
>
> this is a chance for you to prove the nay-sayers wrong (or right).
>
> When re-posting your patch, you can include information on what tips
> you got on how to improve the patch, and how you applied that
> information in the new version of the patch.
>
> This is a good idea for anybody resubmitting a changed patch,
> because it tells other reviewers what changes were made, why, and
> who pointed out the idea for the change.
my god, rik, you're adorable. :-) i predict that, despite what i've
posted *twice*, nick will describe as an "error" what is simply a
checkpatch coding style *warning*. let's watch ...
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
