On September 6, 2014 11:52:20 PM EDT, nick <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >I ran a basic postmark today and the results are below for the btrfs >code on a Seagate Constellation drive I >have for testing. If any of the the btrfs developers read the kernel >newbies list, please send me a list of >tests with docs on how to run them on this drive ,I don't care about >killing it :) and also since it's an >enterprise drive, you can test enterprise tests if wanted. I'm curious if many here know the difference between a consumer drive and a enterprise drive. Obviously a lot of enterprise drives have higher performance and quality specs, but the biggest difference is how they treat media errors. A consumer driver is targeted at standalone use, an enterprise drive is targeted at raid array use. Thus when a consumer drive hits a media error the firmware is setup to re-read that sector repeatedly before it gives up and returns an error to the OS. An enterprise drive's firmware on the other hand is setup to be in a fail fast mode. The idea is from a system perspective it should be better to have the drive return an error immediately upon a media error and let the system get the data via raid-redundancy. That also means the raid system has more granular knowledge of what's going on with the drive and can rewrite valid data as an example to that bad sector. A rewrite can trigger an internal sector reallocation from the spare list. The key thing to note is that in general an enterprise drive is a bad choice for standalone use. The firmware is just setup wrong. I've forgotten if hdparm can be used to switch between the two operating modes. Greg -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
